Lou Reed, Laurie Anderson and John Zorn Spark Walk-Outs at Montreal Jazz Festival
- Posted on Jul 2nd 2010 11:00PM by Laura Lanktree
- Comments (47)
In all fairness, no one really knew what to expect when the legendary Lou Reed, his wife, multimedia artist Laurie Anderson, and saxophone guru John Zorn took the stage at the Montreal Jazz Festival, but it's fairly safe to say that no one expected to be told to "get the f--- out" of the Salle Wilfred Pelletier where the trio performed. That foul-mouthed direction came from Zorn after a second long-winded song ended and frustrated audience members let out some resounding boos. A mass exodus of confused concert-goers followed.
At a press conference earlier this morning, Reed gave little away about the evening's performance. It would be improvisational, he said, because according to him, that's the only way it could ever work.
But did it work? For those who were drawn to the event by Reed's name on the bill, they got a different kind of "Walk On The Wild Side," that's for sure.
Reed, Anderson, and Zorn arrived on a sparse stage, took to their instruments and immediately immersed themselves in a musical narrative...only it was like the background music in a suspenseful horror flick that never revealed the killer's face. Instead, the musicians -- each clearly a master of their own instrument -- continued in a nonsensical fumble. As emotionally rousing as the culminating sound was, it was severely lacking direction and too often sounded like the animal kingdom gone astray.
Despite undeniable chemistry between the three, it was as though they were having a private party -- some audience members drank the champagne and mingled about the conversation, while others felt unwelcome and decided it was time to go.
- Filed under: Concerts and Tours, Jazz, Canada








Reader Comments(1 of 3)
Charles Aat 7-02-2010
Indulgent with intervals of self-parody.
Thank God some audience members had the independence of mind to heckle and boo. I wish I had done the same. An earlier, and punkier, Mr. Reid, faced with such abundant pretension, would have been the most vocal amongst them.
Carol Mcgrathat 7-04-2010
Classic fucking Lou! Wake up peeeps, he is Lou Reed. If your not a die hard fan you have no clue! Reminds me of "Berlin"!
Carlosat 7-03-2010
I was dumbfounded. This is what happens when people start to believe their own bullshit. I have never been witness to such a load of self-indulgent narcissistic crap in my life. I want that less-than-an-hour of my life back. And my 80 bucks.
I didn't know anyone was booing - I thought they were chanting Lou, Lou, Lou.
LittleMissHoopat 7-03-2010
You can get your money back. We did.
LittleMissHoopat 7-03-2010
The show was horrible! And that disrespectful, arrogant comment from Zorn! "If you don't like it, get the f*** out of here.
I did, as many others.
How embarassing; for them, for the Jazz Fest, for Place des Arts...
Naxmellat 7-05-2010
It was terrible. I really wanted to shout "Play Sweet Jane" in the middle of one of their songs. How did you get your money back?
LittleMissHoopat 7-05-2010
@Naxwell:
We got our money back at the box office that same night (immediately after The Comment...)
According to the Gazette, PDA reimbursed people that night, but would not reimburse after that....
Too bad you didn't, as a lot of others who didn't think to do this...
Elizabeth C.at 7-03-2010
The sheer volume level-at least twice as loud as optimal, was, literally, a physical assault-i do not mind risking money, time, or energy on adventurous music, but I won't risk my hearing. Those who stayed will suffer for it. That is more than self-indulgence on the part of the artists: it is aggression unrelated to musical expression. I am very disappointed that artists of this calibre would allow, much less foment, such an attack on the audience.
Alain Abelat 7-03-2010
You're SOOOO right. Sounds were already distorted, but the amplification distorted them to an unbearable degree (on the Corbeille at least). Maybe (but I'm not quite sure...) it would have been an interesting show if the sound had been lower. I decided to leave in the middle of the the third «song», on a note that made me feel I was risking my hearing.
Brian Bat 7-03-2010
I was the one Zorn was responding to with his arrogant, foul-mouthed comment. What did I say? "Play some music!". Even after I left, it appears that they never did. Worst concert of my life (and I've been to hundreds of them).
Wob Eckoat 7-11-2010
Dude, you sound like the guy who would've booed the Velvet Underground when everybody hated them. Besides, I'd like to hear "Sweet Jane" as much as I'd like to hear "Born In the USA" at the Montreal Jazz Fest. Lou Reed always had the "I don't give a crap" attitude which is why he is a survivor.
Riderat 7-03-2010
I have a lot of respect for all three artists (I'm a fan of each in many contexts), but tonight's performance was a pretentious swindle. I'm up for virtually anything musically, but this was amateurish and painful. Furthermore charging nearly $100 for such tripe is scandalous. Mr Zorn, I appreciate your wanting to take chances and encouraging your fellow musicians to explore, but do it on your own dollar. This was completely in-cohesive garbage spontaneously arranged in a steaming pile on the main stage at the Montreal Jazz Festival.
Most importantly, the sound levels in the room were outrageously high. I have spent significant time as a professional musician and I'm familiar with what 100+ decibel sounds like. In the upper levels, concert goers were exposed to levels in excess of reasonable concert levels which left many people plugging their ears out of pure self preservation. Whoever was mixing the house tonight made an unlistenable performance physically painful and potentially dangerous to peoples' hearing.
Best of luck to each of these artists. I ask only that you actually develop something of merit before you unleash it on unsuspecting audiences. Also, I would like to thank Mr Zorn for his "If you don't like it, get the f*** out of here" comments. First, it was sage advice that I took to heart. Second, good for you for not taking any lip from the crowd!
Finally, I'd like to thank the gentleman with the courage to speak up (boo) when the emperor indeed had no clothes on this evening; his honestly and non-conformity in an intolerable situation is refreshing!
Brian Bat 7-03-2010
I just wanted to add that Zorn, Reed and Anderson should be ashamed of the contempt they showed for their audience, by playing their hideous noise (it can't be called "music"), by charging an unsuspecting public for this (it could at least have been called the Pretentious Aural Pain Tour, in order to forewarn people), and for swearing at the audience and telling them to leave. I will never waste another penny of my money or second of my life on those three again.
Magdalenaat 7-03-2010
I think it's sad that the Jazz Fest didn't inform people more beforehand that this show was based on improvisation.
Bad marketing.
Josephat 7-03-2010
I'm not sure whether you were being serious or facetious. Anyone who knows anything about the style known as "jazz" knows that improvisation is a major part of the performance, ESPECIALLY in a live setting. I can only imagine what some of the commenters would've thought if they'd seen shows by some of the true greats of jazz and blues and rock who found improvisation to be a key factor in live performance. Does anyone REALLY think that an artist like Lou Reed would be content with performing "Walk on the Wild Side" in the same old style for nearly 30 years? (Even his time with the Velvet Underground showed how his studio performances could be drastically different from a live performance.) As for Laurie Anderson, for crying out loud, the woman makes a living as a PERFORMANCE artist. She would practically wither if forced to do her catalog the way it's heard on LP or CD. And John Zorn's styles are literally all over the place, but jazz (especially free jazz) sensibilities infuse nearly everything he does.
If you narrowminded cretins only want to hear artists performing songs from their albums, done in the style of those albums, for heaven's sake, listen to the damn albums and DON'T go to a live show. There really is nothing more boring than a live performer simply getting up on a stage and duplicating the album performance (hell, they may as well be lip-syncing, for all that). But when you have 3 very eclectic artists on stage, especially at a JAZZ FESTIVAL, you shouldn't expect any of them to just do a rote performance. (Maybe the Montreal Jazz Festival--as well as other JAZZ festivals--should limit the performers to those who will, oh I don't know, perform JAZZ and to hell with any other style of music. If a rock or hip-hop artist wants to perform, then they need to confine their work to something that fits a jazz sensibility. If you as an attendee want to hear rock artists doing rock music, then DON'T see them at a JAZZ festival.)
francescoat 7-03-2010
That's right - Anderson is a performance artist - what give her the erroneous belief that she has the necessary skill-set to play improv jazz? Last night after the concert I was sadly disappointed. This morning I am angry at being ripped off.
I (like many other people, apparently) was roped in because these artists were cashing in on their names - and we associate a certain weight to come along with that.
I have a strong suspicion that had a second encore been performed by random audience members, no one would have noticed the difference in the sound quality.
The whole thing was like having chopsticks pounded into my ears with a brick. Shame on these people.
And shame on anyone who defends this swindle. This was worse than bad. It was wrong.
Stephenat 7-03-2010
I am glad that I made sure to bring a pair of etymotic earplugs to this. This hasn't been the only very loud show this year. I also found Nadja very hard to enjoy, especially when she would hit the high notes.
FTat 7-03-2010
I was at the concert. I understand many people's frustration with the performance. I had many of the same expectations as others with these three musicians and I was torn whether to cheer or boo. It wasn't easy to listen. It was corrosive and minding numbing. Most audience members know the performers' reputations and repertoire of musical creations. They are talented and artistic. So you've got to ask, why did they do this? The only answer I can think of is it is not music to be liked or disliked. It is experimental. It is thought provoking. It is challenging. Think of it this way. Almost every artistic field like film, painting, photography, poetry, fiction, dance and theatre has experimentalists. Most people will probably never like or enjoy these creations, but as I said, I think they are not meant to be liked or enjoyed. These creations have little or no mainstream reference points for our senses. But somewhere in history and art, future artists will have learned about them or heard them or seen them to push their own boundaries and thereby create new work, perhaps derived or referenced on past experimental work. If it weren’t for experimental creations in the past, we would not have modern creative culture in the present. Experiments continue endlessly. New people do them and old people do them. No one has to enjoy them, but artists will do them anyway.
Michelleat 7-04-2010
Absolutely awful. The worst experience at a concert I've ever had. The only good thing about it is that my outraged husband demanded (and got) our money back. I cannot believe they had the NERVE to charge $100 per ticket for this garbage. What a waste of time and talent. Zorn's comment is very telling--I can only imagine that that is what they were hoping would happen. "Well, guys, we did it...we chased everyone out of the theatre. Well done!"
csb440@yahoo.comat 7-11-2010
Where have you people been? Have you been inside a music bubble? This type of improv/jazz/noice/rock has been around a while. John Cale had been doing it in the 60s with many others, Lou Reed influenced many with his daring Metal Machine Music in the 70s (but I guess you hated that too) and Sonic Youth has been doing this for a while. There is a rich history of noise. Look for it. It is disconcerting, beautiful, shocking and thoughtful. What art is suppose to be or are you into spoon fed easy to chew pop crap? Walk on the Wild Side captures New York and so do these performances, but in another form.
Open your minds and ears. Listen to the city streets, the shrieking of gulls, the aches and groans of an old building and the electronic clicking of our age. Reed/Anderson/Zorn capture the music of the real world. If you need lyrics, do something daring and think of them yourself.